I'm going through all of the links I have saved from the last month or so, and I have a few more related to ASH that are worth sharing, Not necessarily any new information, but at the very least, it's confirmation that some good things were presented at the conference last month.
The website Medscape published two video reviews of the conference. The first is called "ASH 2025: The Clinical Impact of New Therapies and Long-Term Outcomes in Follicular Lymphoma." It features Dr. Kami Maddocks of The Ohio State University. She discusses some of the more important presentations at ASH, and focuses on clinical impacts -- how the new information might directly affect current patients.
Of course, she focuses on the data related to Epcoritamab + R-Squared, which she says is "going to change practice." In other words, we're likely to see it recommended for patients who have Relapsed or Refractory disease who are need of a treatment option. She also mentions Tafasitamab plus R-Squared, and the issues related to sequencing CD19-directed therapies. That is, patients who received Tafasitamab kept the CD19 protein on their cancer cells, meaning a teatment like CAR-T, which targets CD19, should be used after Tafasitamab, not before. (The presentation that discussed this was also on The Leonard List for this year.)
Dr. Maddocks also mentions the research that looked at long-term (20 year) follow-ups of FL patients, which found that 40% of patients who received immunochemotherapy (like R-CHOP or R-Bendamustine) were still disease-free after 15 years. And about 20% of patients who watched and waited continue to do so for 15 years. Finally, this study also showed that the risk of Transformation to a more aggressive Lymphoma decreases after 10 years. Dr. Maddocks says this is all important information when oncologists counsel FL patients about long-term outcomes. (This all sounds very familiar to me, but I can't find a link for this presentation, unfortunately, and the video doesn't include it. But it's great news -- I love a good long-term follow-up.) Finally, she discussed the research about GLP-1s and indolent Lymphomas including FL, something else that was on The Leonard List. (You might remember that I was hesitant to discuss that one. Dr. Maddocks thinks it looks very interesting, but there needs to be more data collected about it.)
So lots of good information, with the focus on how it all plays out right now in the doctor's office.
The second video review from Medscape is called "New Options in Follicular Lymphoma From ASH 2025," and features Dr. Michael R. Bishop from the University of Chicago. As the title suggests, Dr. Bishop is interested in some of the new treatments that were presented at ASH. Of course, he starts with Epcoritamab (because that's what everyone is excited about -- he calls it "The Big News" from the conference. He also mentions the presentation on Epcoritamab + R-Squared in untreated FL. He wants to see long-term follow-up to make sure the excellent responses will last, and he points out that it was a very small trial.
Dr. Bishop also looks at a presentation on the CAR-T known as Liso-cel. In this research, Liso-cel was given to FL patients who were "heavily pre-treated" -- who had already received at least two other treatments. The results were great -- a 97% Overall Response Rate, including a 94% Complete Response. After 36 months, 75% of patients had not yet needed another treatment. (Sorry -- I don't have a link for this one, either, but it's no surprise that a CAR-T was effective, though Dr. Bishop did point out that there were some secondary cancers in some patients.)
He also discussed another of The Leonard List presentations, this one looking at the Gallium Trial, showing that mutations in EZH2 and CREBBP could help predict success with Bendamustine. This research is important in showing how biomarkers can help guide treatment.
So, again, not much that hasn't been covered already, but I do think it's important to show that multiple Lymphoma experts see certain research as moving us forward. It's hard to see that when just reading abstracts. I enjoy hearing experts tell me what excited them after the conference is over. If you've ever been to a professional conference of any kind, there's a special kind of magic that you feel afterwards, when you have all of this new knowledge that's really exciting. These videos capture just a little bit of that.
More soon.